For Immediate Release Contact: Luke Esser
August 27, 2008 425-460-0570
Darcy Burner’s Post-Primary Ramblings …
“…the Democrats in the race got more than 50% of the vote.” – DarcyBurner.com, 8/25/2008
"The truth is, Vaughn was a marginal candidate who raised no money, won no endorsements, and took a meaningless sliver of the primary vote -- and the idea his endorsement will get Democrats to vote for Reichert is a joke." – Dwight Pelz, PolitickerWA.com, 8/25/2008
Bellevue, WA…Unwilling to accept her loss in the primary election, Darcy Burner and her Democrat allies continue their attempts to explain, justify – even distort – the facts regarding her loss in the 8th congressional district primary election. They are apparently also willing to alienate moderate and "Blue Dog" Democratic voters by attacking the candidates whom they supported in the primary.
Evaluating the numbers, Democrat candidates remain shy of 50 percent of the vote, with Burner at 44.5, Jim Vaughn at 3.31, and Keith Arnold at 1.25. An estimated 10,000 ballots remain to be counted.
Clearly the loser of the 2006 race has not created momentum for herself this time around and has no intention of broadening her appeal to Democrats outside of the party's extreme left-wing. And this, even after Burner spent hundreds of thousands of dollars intended to help her win an otherwise meaningless primary election.
Burner and State Democrats have now set about downplaying not just the results of the primary – which show her losing – but also subsequent endorsements by other candidates who have come out in support of her opponent, Dave Reichert. One of those candidates, a self-described "Blue Dog Democrat" who took 3 percent of the primary vote, was contacted by the Burner campaign to ask for his support; he declined. Yet Burner has clearly indicated she would not join the centrist Blue Dogs once in Congress, and she does not receive their support at home.
A bit dishonest, then, the statement on Burner's campaign website blithely reassuring her supporters that Democrats took a majority of votes cast in the primary, and that her campaign isn't "taking anything for granted" moving forward.
Burner has made clear on numerous occasions that a primary win would affect her campaign resources going into the general election. Clearly Burner is now concerned that her more liberal supporters, both inside and outside the 8th district, are reconsidering their financial commitments and are likely to get more mileage on their investment elsewhere, rather than throw money after a chronic, ineffective candidate.
Likely, Burner and the State Democrats have taken a gamble on these facts not coming to light; if national groups who have committed to support her campaign catch wind that she’s losing, rather than gaining support, the wheels could quickly come off her campaign.
###